Down to the finish line. We've covered heroes, monsters, and the EDGE. What else is there?
Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Books. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 10, 2018
Sunday, January 7, 2018
Nouveau 52, part 9
Kicking off the new year, let's move into the Dark, with a few detours along the way.
Sunday, December 17, 2017
Nouveau 52, part 8
Winding down a bit, but there might be a question about some of the other heroes. DC's always been big on buying out other companies, so where would they be in my take on the 52?
Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Nouveau 52, part 7
Main books are out of the way, as are the teens. So why not take a trip to the EDGE?
Tuesday, December 12, 2017
Nouveau 52, part 6
Now that we've finished the JLA and Trinity section, what about the rest of the DCU?
So let's take a look at the Young Justice section and see the heroes of tomorrow!
So let's take a look at the Young Justice section and see the heroes of tomorrow!
Monday, December 11, 2017
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
Nouveau 52, part 4
We did the trilogy, so how about the rest of the Justice League series? Or least the first half.
Saturday, November 25, 2017
Nouveau 52, part 3
I hope everyone had a decent Thanksgiving.
With the holiday bit out of the way, let's focus on the last part of the DC Trinity.
With the holiday bit out of the way, let's focus on the last part of the DC Trinity.
Monday, November 13, 2017
Nouveau 52, part 2
Ok, Superman is more or less out of the way for the First Wave. How about the Dark Knight?
Thursday, November 2, 2017
Nouveau 52, part 1
A bit late I know, but if DC can screw around with their characters, why can't I?
This is basically what I'd do, assuming the higher ups at DC lost their damn minds and put me in charge of the new 52.
Overall, I'd keep the staff 50/50. Half veterans (Morrison, Simone, Ennis, etc.) and half new comers. Why? Because George Perez wasn't George Perez until someone gave him a chance. Also, with a few series aside, most of them would be set around the same time. No alternative Earths, no twenty different versions of Batman running around, etc. We'd start simple. Expand to crazy if you have to, but simple first.
On to the series and a few running plot threads. Right now we'll take a look at the First Wave.
This is basically what I'd do, assuming the higher ups at DC lost their damn minds and put me in charge of the new 52.
Overall, I'd keep the staff 50/50. Half veterans (Morrison, Simone, Ennis, etc.) and half new comers. Why? Because George Perez wasn't George Perez until someone gave him a chance. Also, with a few series aside, most of them would be set around the same time. No alternative Earths, no twenty different versions of Batman running around, etc. We'd start simple. Expand to crazy if you have to, but simple first.
On to the series and a few running plot threads. Right now we'll take a look at the First Wave.
Thursday, August 20, 2015
HB to HP
On this day one hundred and twenty five years ago, Howard Phillip Lovecraft came into the world. This is a tribute and more rambling thoughts on the man's work.
I'd like to say I first discovered the man's mythos in a dank New England library by the sea, where a wall eyed man thrust a bound and locked copy of the Necronomicon into my hands before muttering prayers to the Old Ones.
The truth is I didn't actually read anything of his until I was well into my twenties. I had seen the name, but mostly on video box titles in the local shops. Delving deeper into horror, it was hard to avoid references or praise to the man's work as everyone from King to Gaiman have made mentions of him.
The first two stories I properly read were something though, and they served a fine introduction to cosmic horror. "Rats in the Walls" and "the Call of Cthulhu" were both gripping yarns, although the rest of his work didn't light up my mind like Howard's did. Lovecraft's academic New England protagonists wore thin after a while, not to mention the racism.
Still; and one of this odd "I like the idea more than the work itself" things that bubbles up every now and then, I did grow to enjoy the Cthulhu Mythos. So crack open a tin of beans, scoop some vanilla ice cream afterwards, and enjoy a good book.
I'd like to say I first discovered the man's mythos in a dank New England library by the sea, where a wall eyed man thrust a bound and locked copy of the Necronomicon into my hands before muttering prayers to the Old Ones.
The truth is I didn't actually read anything of his until I was well into my twenties. I had seen the name, but mostly on video box titles in the local shops. Delving deeper into horror, it was hard to avoid references or praise to the man's work as everyone from King to Gaiman have made mentions of him.
The first two stories I properly read were something though, and they served a fine introduction to cosmic horror. "Rats in the Walls" and "the Call of Cthulhu" were both gripping yarns, although the rest of his work didn't light up my mind like Howard's did. Lovecraft's academic New England protagonists wore thin after a while, not to mention the racism.
Still; and one of this odd "I like the idea more than the work itself" things that bubbles up every now and then, I did grow to enjoy the Cthulhu Mythos. So crack open a tin of beans, scoop some vanilla ice cream afterwards, and enjoy a good book.
Sunday, December 28, 2014
So Long 2014 and stuff for 2015
There's going to be some more updates for 2015. I can't promise a new one every week, but hopefully once a month at a minimum. More details later.
Friday, October 28, 2011
"Shadows of the Apt" Doesn't Redefine Fantasy, It Just Does It Better
by: Jesse Baruffi
In a shocking twist that will surprise absolutely no one, I grew up reading lots of fantasy. While that doesn't exactly make me an expert or anything, it has caused me to spend a lot of time thinking about the genre and what makes it tick, and even try my hand at writing some. At some point, I do intend to do an article on fantasy in general, on what works and what doesn't, but that's a pretty huge topic and one I don't want to go into in a half-baked way. For right now, suffice it to say that a lot of fantasy bugs me, despite my love for the genre. I grow weary when I walk into the fantasy section of the bookstore and come across endless series of impenetrable pseudo-Tolkien stories and retellings of the author's D&D campaigns. Then more recently, I've come across the works of mega-authors like Robert Jordan and George R.R. Martin, both of whom I dislike (as authors, I'm sure they're perfectly nice people). Jordan for his bizarre sexism and unwillingness to finish a story, no matter how many thousands of pages he takes, and Martin because, although he is at least a talented writer, his books are essentially plotless amoral blood porn, which also can't finish a single story in thousands of pages. Given all this, when I do read fantasy, it's either the classics, such as Roger Zelazny and Robert E. Howard, or light-hearted one-shot novels by A. Lee Martinez or well-done parodies like Order of the Stick, and I've generally avoided newer series altogether.
Then my friend Tom tells me about a series he's reading called "Shadows of the Apt" by a fellow named Adrian Tchaikovsky. He says it's a very good fantasy series and I would probably like it. I nod my head, somewhat interested, but given my recent skepticism of fantasy, combined with the fact that I am naturally both lazy and cheap, I didn't jump on buying them. This is how I know Tom is a good friend: he actually bought me all four books on Amazon and mailed them to me. Given the brazen generosity of this act, I had no choice but to read the series, and I am very glad I did.
While the premise of the series is pretty standard, i.e. an evil empire is trying to take over the world, and only a small band of mismatched idealists and miscreants can stop them, the unique execution is where the story shines. For one thing, the races of the world are all attached to totemic insects. Usually in fiction, when insects are portrayed, it's as being icky or evil or at best primordial, but Tchaikovsky is clearly a student of entomology, and treats the underappreciated creatures with a grand sense of reverence and fascination that to my knowledge has not been done elsewhere (funny enough, the series actually made me like insects more). This allows for a fascinating variety of cultures that may be dotted with elements you've seen before, but are extremely distinct and filled with vibrant individuals as well as believable cultural cohesion. For another, most fantasy worlds tend to be suspended in time, as magic by its nature is timeless, and for some reason, technology never moves beyond the medieval level, except for ancient races and bad guys. Tchaikovsky's world has a fair amount of technology to begin with, but much like in real life, the war moves it forward. We see the technological people (as there is a clear divide between who can use magic and who technology) grow more advanced, while the magical races slowly diminish, and all this just in a few short years. This allows the stakes to rise without seeming absurd or artificial, and in fact, it resembles our own war history.
Obviously, a story like this wouldn't work if the characters weren't interesting. What Tchaikovsky does to make them work well is to force them into places where they must make decisions that aren't clearly black and white. As most of the protagonists are youths on the cusp of adulthood or veterans who are past their prime, and the Wasp Empire is such a colossal enemy, they must often choose between doing the moral thing and the practical thing to survive or help others survive. I don't tend to like stories where characters always choose the practical thing in the most amoral way possible (I'm looking at YOU, Battlestar Galactica!), but in a story where the characters make a variety of choices along this spectrum, and the results are just as varied, I am pleased to see how these choices are used as honest-to-goodness character development that also moves the story along. And while the story focuses on a relatively small number of characters at first, the cast grows to be huge without ever feeling overwhelming. Even the villains are very different one to another. Certainly enough agents of the Wasp Empire are ruthless and brutal (the Empire itself being a curious mix of Nazis, Spartans, and Mayans), but many are just people doing their best in an unstoppably evil society. It is also worth noting that people die in these books. While it's not filled with pointless shock-value deaths like Martin, just about no one is safe, and many people you come to care about will die or have horrible things happen to them. As a consequence, when the heroes do succeed at something, it feels like they've earned it.
So far, there are seven of these books, only five of which are currently available in the U.S. (though I cheat and buy them from England), of a planned ten-book series. Considering he is a family man with a demanding day job, the fact that Tchaikovsky releases these 500+ page books every six months or so implies a nigh-superhuman speed and prolificity (is that a word? I'm not sure). Makes an aspiring slacker like me feel incredibly humbled by my own meager turnout.
I also highly recommend checking out his website, Shadows of the Apt, which has all manner of supplemental information, artwork, and short stories, many of which do eventually filter their characters into the books.
In a shocking twist that will surprise absolutely no one, I grew up reading lots of fantasy. While that doesn't exactly make me an expert or anything, it has caused me to spend a lot of time thinking about the genre and what makes it tick, and even try my hand at writing some. At some point, I do intend to do an article on fantasy in general, on what works and what doesn't, but that's a pretty huge topic and one I don't want to go into in a half-baked way. For right now, suffice it to say that a lot of fantasy bugs me, despite my love for the genre. I grow weary when I walk into the fantasy section of the bookstore and come across endless series of impenetrable pseudo-Tolkien stories and retellings of the author's D&D campaigns. Then more recently, I've come across the works of mega-authors like Robert Jordan and George R.R. Martin, both of whom I dislike (as authors, I'm sure they're perfectly nice people). Jordan for his bizarre sexism and unwillingness to finish a story, no matter how many thousands of pages he takes, and Martin because, although he is at least a talented writer, his books are essentially plotless amoral blood porn, which also can't finish a single story in thousands of pages. Given all this, when I do read fantasy, it's either the classics, such as Roger Zelazny and Robert E. Howard, or light-hearted one-shot novels by A. Lee Martinez or well-done parodies like Order of the Stick, and I've generally avoided newer series altogether.
Then my friend Tom tells me about a series he's reading called "Shadows of the Apt" by a fellow named Adrian Tchaikovsky. He says it's a very good fantasy series and I would probably like it. I nod my head, somewhat interested, but given my recent skepticism of fantasy, combined with the fact that I am naturally both lazy and cheap, I didn't jump on buying them. This is how I know Tom is a good friend: he actually bought me all four books on Amazon and mailed them to me. Given the brazen generosity of this act, I had no choice but to read the series, and I am very glad I did.
While the premise of the series is pretty standard, i.e. an evil empire is trying to take over the world, and only a small band of mismatched idealists and miscreants can stop them, the unique execution is where the story shines. For one thing, the races of the world are all attached to totemic insects. Usually in fiction, when insects are portrayed, it's as being icky or evil or at best primordial, but Tchaikovsky is clearly a student of entomology, and treats the underappreciated creatures with a grand sense of reverence and fascination that to my knowledge has not been done elsewhere (funny enough, the series actually made me like insects more). This allows for a fascinating variety of cultures that may be dotted with elements you've seen before, but are extremely distinct and filled with vibrant individuals as well as believable cultural cohesion. For another, most fantasy worlds tend to be suspended in time, as magic by its nature is timeless, and for some reason, technology never moves beyond the medieval level, except for ancient races and bad guys. Tchaikovsky's world has a fair amount of technology to begin with, but much like in real life, the war moves it forward. We see the technological people (as there is a clear divide between who can use magic and who technology) grow more advanced, while the magical races slowly diminish, and all this just in a few short years. This allows the stakes to rise without seeming absurd or artificial, and in fact, it resembles our own war history.
Obviously, a story like this wouldn't work if the characters weren't interesting. What Tchaikovsky does to make them work well is to force them into places where they must make decisions that aren't clearly black and white. As most of the protagonists are youths on the cusp of adulthood or veterans who are past their prime, and the Wasp Empire is such a colossal enemy, they must often choose between doing the moral thing and the practical thing to survive or help others survive. I don't tend to like stories where characters always choose the practical thing in the most amoral way possible (I'm looking at YOU, Battlestar Galactica!), but in a story where the characters make a variety of choices along this spectrum, and the results are just as varied, I am pleased to see how these choices are used as honest-to-goodness character development that also moves the story along. And while the story focuses on a relatively small number of characters at first, the cast grows to be huge without ever feeling overwhelming. Even the villains are very different one to another. Certainly enough agents of the Wasp Empire are ruthless and brutal (the Empire itself being a curious mix of Nazis, Spartans, and Mayans), but many are just people doing their best in an unstoppably evil society. It is also worth noting that people die in these books. While it's not filled with pointless shock-value deaths like Martin, just about no one is safe, and many people you come to care about will die or have horrible things happen to them. As a consequence, when the heroes do succeed at something, it feels like they've earned it.
So far, there are seven of these books, only five of which are currently available in the U.S. (though I cheat and buy them from England), of a planned ten-book series. Considering he is a family man with a demanding day job, the fact that Tchaikovsky releases these 500+ page books every six months or so implies a nigh-superhuman speed and prolificity (is that a word? I'm not sure). Makes an aspiring slacker like me feel incredibly humbled by my own meager turnout.
I also highly recommend checking out his website, Shadows of the Apt, which has all manner of supplemental information, artwork, and short stories, many of which do eventually filter their characters into the books.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)